
Cytoplast™ PTFE
Your easy choice of dense PTFE membranes to expand grafting options
Broad range of synthetic non-resorbable membranes, including Ti-reinforced

Cytoplast™ TXT-200 and TXT-200 singles
Purposely leave the membrane exposed to allow preservation of the soft tissue architecture and keratinized mucosa.
Non-resorbable
Won’t resorb prematurely – you dictate healing time.
Soft tissue attaches, but doesn’t grow through the membrane
Exposed membrane allows for non-surgical removal; no anesthesia required.
100% dense (non-expanded) PTFE
Impervious to bacteria – pore size less than 0.3 μm.
Clinical predictability
In two separate studies treating a total of 696 extraction sites using dense PTFE membranes in an exposed technique, there were no reported infections.1, 2

Cytoplast™ Ti-reinforced PTFE membrane
Traditional frame design
Incorporating delicate and strategically-placed titanium “struts” with more than 25 years of clinical history and successful use in GBR.
Delicate, lightweight framework
Easy to trim and compliant with the overlying soft tissues.
Handling options
Broad portfolio with 15 shapes in 2 thicknesses.
Less is more
Less titanium bulk allows for greater versatility in shaping and placement providing additional stability in large, non-spacemaking osseous defects.
Clinical efficacy
-
Bone loss 1-year post-extraction³
Vertical bone loss measured at crest. Horizontal measured from stent to buccal plate.
-
Soft tissue regeneration 90 days post-extraction⁴
Measured as reduction of the occlusal distance between buccal and lingual gingival margins.
-
Vertical ridge augmentation around implants⁵
Mean vertical bone regeneration.
Designed to aid in membrane stabilization
Hexagonal surface dimples provide a textured surface that increases the area available for cellular attachment without increasing porosity. The textured surface is designed to help stabilize the membrane and the soft tissue flap.

-
Webinar with Dr. Istvan Urban
Vertical ridge augmentation
Questions about Cytoplast™ PTFE ?
If you would like additional information, more details, or have specific questions about Cytoplast™ PTFE, click the link.
References
See Instructions For Use for full prescribing information, including indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions.
- Barboza EP, Stutz B, Ferreira VF, Carvalho W. Guided bone regeneration using nonexpanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in preparation for dental implant placements - A report of 420 cases. Implant Dent. 2010;19:2-7
Read on PubMed - Hoffman O, Bartee BK, Beaumont C, Kasaj A, Deli G, Zafiropoulos GG. Alveolar bone preservation in extraction sockets using non-resorbable dPTFE membranes: A retrospective non-randomized study. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1355-1369.
Read on PubMed - Fotek Pd, Neiva Rf, Wang Hl.Comparison Of Dermal Matrix And Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane For Socket Bone Augmentation: A Clinical And Histologic Study. J Periodontol. 2009;80:776-785.
Read on PubMed - Barboza Ep, Francisco Bs, Ferreira Vf. Soft tissue enhancement using non-expanded PTFE membranes without primary closure. Presented at the 2008 Research Forum Poster Session. Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) in Seattle, WA, September 6-9, 2008.
Read here - Ronda M, Rebaudi A, Torelli L, Stacchi C. Expanded vs. dense polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2014 Jul;25(7):859-66.
Read on PubMed
See full references for Cytoplast™ TXT-200s and TXT-200 singles here
See full references for Cytoplast™ Ti-reinforced PTFE membranes here