Science behind NobelProcera Abutments

Discover findings from recent clinical studies

NobelProcera Abutments

How can you get NobelProcera products?

Simply order them from a NobelProcera lab partner near you.

Proven system performance – Nobel Biocare

In a five-year follow up of a controlled clinical trial comparing the outcomes of NobelProcera titanium versus zirconia abutments, the authors reported no screw loosening, abutment or crown failures for either tested group.1

Over the long-term, excellent clinical outcomes of NobelProcera zirconia abutments have been reported. A 10-year follow-up study found patients and clinicians to be extremely satisfied with the esthetics of the restoration, low rates of biological and technical complications, small changes in peri-implant bone levels, and excellent implant survival rates.2

Findings from in-vitro experiments on Nobel Biocare CAD/CAM abutments point to high system stability and resistance to screw loosening,3 and rotational freedom below the threshold associated with screw loosening.4-7

Low risk of screw loosening 

In a recent study NobelProcera Abutments were concluded to have a lower risk of screw loosening compared to other abutments tested, thanks to a minimal settling effect on loading and low micro-movement at the implant-abutment interface.8 NobelProcera abutments remained close to their position at insertion providing high joint stability.

Download study summary (PDF)

Graph

Predictable, strong performance

Recent research by leading materials expert Prof. J. Robert Kelly looked at the fatigue strength of zirconia abutments. The four abutments looked very similar in clinical examination but differed in performance, indicating the impact of design and production method.9

NobelProcera products demonstrated outstanding performance in this research, leading Prof. Kelly to conclude that "Nobel Biocare is a high-quality manufacturer. The company manufactures components that are designed, tested and then verified."

Download study summary (PDF)

Kelly study graphic

Low mechanical complications with angulated screw channel solutions

Greer et al. investigated mechanical complications associated with NobelProcera angulated screw channel restorations, following placement of the final prosthetics. They found that 96% of the restorations placed experienced no complications during up to a two-year follow-up period.10

NobelProcera products with angulated screw channel proved to be a reliable, flexible and retrievable alternative to traditional cement- or screw-retained restorations. Moreover, 38% of the restorations were fitted by post-graduate trainees. This highlights the ease of use of the ASC solutions. 

Download study summary (PDF)

 

 

Important safety information

Treatment with dental implants is a surgical procedure and requires prior evaluation by your dentist to make sure your dental and general health permits dental implant treatment. Placement of dental implants is done during a surgical procedure, which has associated general risk, including infection, possible damage to nerve tissue, and excessive bleeding during or after the surgery. Consult your clinician to find out if dental implants are the right option for you.

Disclaimers: For professional use only. Caution: Federal (United States) law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a dentist.

References

1 Zembic A, Bosch A, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24(4):38490. Read more

2 Ekfeldt A, Fürst B, Carlsson GE. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a 10- to 11-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep 24. Read more

3 Delben JA, Gomes EA, Barao VA, Kuboki Y, Assuncao WG. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(2):251-6. Read more

Gigandet M, Bigolin G, Faoro F, Burgin W, Bragger U. Implants with Original and Non-Original Abutment Connections. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16(2):303–11. Read more

Garine WN, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Wodenscheck J, Murphy WC. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(6):928-38. Read more

6 Lang LA, Wang RF, May KB. The influence of abutment screw tightening on screw joint configuration. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87(1):74-9. Read more

Binon PP. The effect of implant/abutment hexagonal misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9(2):149-60. Read more

8 Karl M, Taylor TD. Effect of cyclic loading on micromotion at the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016. Read more

9 Kelly, J.R. & Rungruanganunt, P., Fatigue behavior of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture ceramic abutments as a function of design and ceramics processing, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 31/3 (2016), 601–9. Read more

10 Greer AC, Hoyle PJ, Vere JW, Wragg PF. Mechanical Complications Associated with Angled Screw Channel Restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2017 May/Jun;30(3):258-259. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5150. Read more