The implant system with exceptional versatility for universal use
The NobelParallel Conical Connection is straightforward in design and application. It offers extraordinary flexibility that you'll appreciate whether you're an experienced clinician or new to implantology. The well-documented implant body provides high primary stability and allows for universal use in all bone qualities and a wide range of indications.
Cover the majority of your cases with only one implant system - no matter if you're placing implants in the anterior or posterior region1,2,6 or treating single tooth, multiple-teeth or full-arch restorations.1,2,3,4,5,6,7
The well-documented implant body is designed for universal use in all bone qualities and a wide range of indications.1,2,3
The surgical protocol in combination with the implant design (TiUnite surface, threads from tip to platform and the tapered apex) are all designed to provide high primary stability and support the Immediate Function protocol.1,4 The NobelParallel Conical Connection apex design also allows for bi-cortical anchorage to obtain high primary stability in cases of reduced bone density.5
A limited number of drills ensures a straightforward surgical protocol that can be flexibly used in different bone densities.
Take advantage of innovative solutions available only for Nobel Biocare's conical connection. These include the cement-free NobelProcera ASC (angulated screw channel) Abutment and the NobelProcera FCZ (full-contour zirconia) Implant Crown. Experience the unique pick-up function of the Omnigrip tooling and its incredible grip on the screw.
The advanced internal conical connection with hexagonal interlocking offers high mechanical strength.
NobelParallel Conical Connection supports the comprehensive range of NobelProcera CAD/CAM dental prosthetics as well as Nobel Biocare's full range of prefabricated abutments.
NobelParallel Conical Connection features a dual-function prosthetic connection with internal conical connection for abutment-supported restorations as well as an implant shoulder for unique NobelProcera Implant Bridges in titanium and zirconia.
Case courtesy of Dr. Léon Pariente and Dr. Karim Dada, France
Situation: Fractured maxillary first molar, tooth extraction indicated.
Solution: Immediate implant placement in extraction socket using a NobelParallel Conical Connection implant and NobelGuide pilot drilling template.
View case (PDF, 519 kB)
Case courtesy of Dr. Léon Pariente and Dr. Karim Dada, France
Situation: Root fracture of upper lateral incisor, tooth extraction indicated.
Solution: Immediate implant placement in extraction socket using a NobelParallel Conical Connection implant and NobelGuide pilot drilling template. Immediate provisionalization on the day of surgery and final restoration using the NobelProcera ASC Abutment.
View case (PDF, 884 kB)
Case courtesy of Dr. Roland Glauser, Switzerland
Situation: Missing maxillary first premolar, healed site
Solution: Immediate implant placement using a NobelParallel CC RP 4.3 implant and NobelGuide Pilot Drill Surgical Template. Immediate provisionalization on the day of surgery.
Case courtesy of Dr. Steffen Buchholz, Germany
Situation: Edentulous mandible with wide alveolar.
Solution: Full-arch reconstruction with immediate provisionalization using the All-on-4® treatment concept. NobelParallel CC RP 4.3 x 13 mm implants with a NobelProcera Implant Bridge as the final restoration.
View case (PDF, 1 MB)
Case courtesy of Dr. Claude Authelain, France
Situation: Partially edentulous in the lower and upper jaw, upper jaw to be treated at a later stage, narrow crest situation.
Solution: Endodontic treatment of infected area and placement of two NobelParallel Conical Connection implants. A NobelProcera Implant Bridge Titanium is chosen as the final restorative solution.
View case (PDF, 506 kB)
Case courtesy of Dr. Claude Authelain, France
Situation: 67-year-old male patient with periodontal disease of the inferior incisors.
Solution: Immediate replacement of four lower incisors using two NobelParallel Conical Connection implants and a provisional bridge.
Case courtesy of Prof. Alessandro Pozzi, Italy
Situation: Male patient, 66 years old. Vertical tooth drift of the four lower incisors, class II dento-skeletal malocclusion, chronic periodontitis, tooth mobility and dental caries.
Solution: NobelParallel Conical Connection 3.75 x 13 mm. NobelGuide pilot drill surgical template in fresh extraction socket. Flapless surgery. Immediate provisionalization. NobelProcera Zirconia Implant Bridge
View case (PDF, 799 kB)
"I have been impressed with NobelParallel Conical Connection. The drill protocol is straightforward and the implant performs well in all bone qualities. I have found that NobelParallel Conical Connection provides excellent primary stability, making it a good implant choice for different indications."
Dr. Sascha Jovanovic, Periodontist and Academic Chairman, gIDE Institute, Los Angeles, USA.
"It's an amazing implant. It has a pointed apex and parallel walls, which makes it perfect for thin crest and very soft bone. (...) We can go for bi-cortical anchorage, and that makes a huge difference when you are going for Immediate Function, especially in the posterior maxilla".
Dr. Ana Ferro, Malo Clinic, Lisbon, Portugal
"It's a versatile implant, which allows for lots of indications".
Dr. Claude Authelain, Oral surgeon, Strasbourg, France
"We've seen that the implant is very very stable, it's excellent to use in very soft bone as well as hard bone. It's very easy to use, so it's an ideal dental implant for beginners."
Dr. Giorgio Tabanella, Periodontist, Rome, Italy
"Impressive performance in fresh extraction sockets, easy to use and to achieve the proper primary stability for the immediate loading procedures. An implant design that enhances the minimally invasive surgical approach and meets the biology of bone and soft tissue."
Dr. Alessandro Pozzi, Prosthodontist, Rome, Italy
"I believe this new NobelParallel Conical Connection offers a very universal implant. We have the benefits of the internal connection and yet not compromising the primary stability. To me this a very user-friendly implant, which is applicable in most areas of the mouth".
Dr. David Dunn, gIDE - Global Institute for Dental Education, Sydney, Australia
1. Agliardi EL, Pozzi A, Stappert CF, Benzi R, Romeo D, Gherlone E (2014). Immediate Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: A Prospective Clinical and Radiological Study after 3 Years of Loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 16(2), 292–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00482.
2. Malo P, Araujo Nobre MD, Lopes A, Rodrigues R (epub ahead 2014). Double Full-Arch Versus Single FullArch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study. J Prosthodont. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12228.
3. Malo P, Nobre M. Flap vs. flapless surgical techniques at immediate implant function in predominantly soft bone for rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective cohort study with follow-up of 1 year. Eur J Oral Implantol 2008;1(4):293-304.
4. Tallarico M, Vaccarella A, Marzi GC, Alviani A, Campana V. A prospective case-control clinical trial comparing 1- and 2-stage nobel biocare tiunite implants: resonance frequency analysis assessed by osstell mentor during integration. Quintessence Int. 2011;42(8):635-44.
5. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss S. Posterior maxillary implants inserted with bicortical anchorage and placed in immediate function for partial or complete edentulous rehabilitations. A retrospective clinical study with a median follow-up of 7 years. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 [Epub ahead].
6. Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Marchetti M, Scarfo B, Esposito M. Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(3):229-42.
7. Villa R, Rangert B. Immediate and early function of implants placed in extraction sockets of maxillary infected teeth: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(6 Suppl):S96-S108.
8. Zechner W, Tangl S, Fürst G, Tepper G, Thams U, Mailath G, Watzek G. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(2):150-7.
9. Schüpbach P, Glauser R, Rocci A, Martignoni M, Sennerby L, Lundgren A, Gottlow J. The human bone-oxidized titanium implant interface: A light microscopic, scanning electron microscopic, back-scatter scanning electron microscopic, and energy-dispersive x-ray study of clinically retrieved dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7 Suppl 1:S36-43.
10. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18(3):341-8.
11. Hall J, Miranda-Burgos P, Sennerby L. Stimulation of directed bone growth at oxidized implants by macroscopic grooves: an in vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 (Suppl 1):76-82.
